In this episode of Humanity at Scale, host Bruce Temkin speaks with Melina Moleskis about the science of sound judgment and building better decision systems.
Drawing on behavioral decision science, Melina explains why years of experience don't always translate into expertise and how "decision friction" quietly undermines even the most capable teams. From the "basketball analogy" of feedback loops to the power of a "premortem," she shares practical strategies for shifting focus from outcomes to processes and designing environments where collective intelligence can flourish.
In this episode of Humanity at Scale, host Bruce Temkin speaks with Melina Moleskis about the science of sound judgment and building better decision systems.
Drawing on behavioral decision science, Melina explains why years of experience don't always translate into expertise and how "decision friction" quietly undermines even the most capable teams. From the "basketball analogy" of feedback loops to the power of a "premortem," she shares practical strategies for shifting focus from outcomes to processes and designing environments where collective intelligence can flourish.
Here are some of the topics that Bruce and Melina explore:
- Why 91% of leaders believe they are above-average decision-makers while simultaneously skipping structured processes.
- The three critical layers of decision-making: cognitive skills, interactive dynamics, and structural context.
- How to use "awkward" tools like the premortem to test for psychological safety and risk.
- The "Decision Friction" trap: Identifying where information gets stuck in hallways and meetings.
- Why "Outcome Bias" leads organizations to reward luck rather than repeatable processes.
- Using AI as a "thinking sparring partner" without outsourcing human judgment and values.
Melina Moleskis is a behavioral decision scientist and the founder of Meta Decisions, a firm that helps organizations strengthen group decision practices and design behavior change strategies. She serves as the Director of Research at the Global Association for Applied Behavioral Scientists (GAABS) and advises both public and private institutions on the practical application of decision science. With a background in mathematics, economics, and a PhD in decision science, Melina is on a mission to treat decision-making as a foundational skill that should be taught from a young age.
Episode Highlights:
- 00:00 Intro: Decision making is a foreign language, not an innate ability.
- 02:36 From Mathematician to Observer: A journey into the behavioral side of models.
- 05:30 Confident Humility: Why leadership should be about direction, not blind trust.
- 06:41 The Confidence-Competence Gap: Relying on memory over data.
- 09:44 The Basketball Analogy: Why business environments lack stable feedback loops.
- 12:00 The Three Layers: Cognitive, Interactive, and Contextual failures.
- 14:30 The Premortem Test: Using "pessimism" to identify hidden risks.
- 20:27 Decision Friction: What happens when teams get stuck in the "hallway track".
- 24:30 Process vs. Outcome: Why elite coaches applaud the "play," not just the basket.
- 29:30 Five Minutes of Discipline: Framing decisions in fast-moving environments.
- 33:30 The Education Gap: Why we should teach decision-making to five-year-olds.
- 41:30 AI as "System Three": Automating tasks without losing human values.
- 47:53 Final Wisdom: Human-centricity, inclusivity, and the surrounding environment.
- 49:28 Key Takeaways: Lessons on psychological safety and the discipline of judgment.
Guest Resources:
Links:
- Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/confidence-isnt-competence-better-decision-systems/id1798239022?i=1000757656436
- Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/6or1Z5Bo5UiCGQiwDwo6rm?si=41Inl9yXR5yks-v86qEK5w
- YouTube: https://youtu.be/6SfHUpqoeyQ